White House Order Against Diversity Training Generates Confusion – Jaweb

0
77
White House Order Against Diversity Training Generates Confusion

Some U.S. business groups are pushing back against a White House directive to limit racial-sensitivity training, which has caused confusion for some private businesses with federal contracts.

Trade groups representing pharmaceutical makers, technology giants and advertising agencies have issued statements protesting President Trump’s executive order. They say the order attacks free speech and undermines workplace equity. As they seek to understand the directive, some companies are putting diversity training on pause, while several federal agencies have canceled scheduled events.

The executive order, issued on Sept. 22, prohibits federal agencies, companies with federal contracts, and recipients of federal grants from participating in training that “promotes race or sex-stereotyping or scapegoating.” The Trump administration threatens to suspend or cancel federal contracts with companies that violate the order.

Many major U.S. companies have federal contracts, and many universities and hospitals receive federal grants.

“The president has elevated the debate about critical race theory and extended the fight across multiple institutions,” said Christopher Rufo, a conservative researcher who says his writings on the issue helped spark the White House’s interest.

Critical race theory, developed several decades ago in law schools, says racism is embedded in U.S. institutions and hasn’t been eradicated by changes of laws. The academic field relates to topics that are discussed in diversity training like bias, but the theory itself is rarely discussed, according to people who create diversity trainings.

In the presidential debate last week, Mr. Trump said he signed the order because “they were teaching people that our country is a horrible place, it’s a racist place. And they were teaching people to hate our country. And I’m not gonna allow that to happen.”

Steve Bucherati, the former chief diversity officer at Coca-Cola Co. and now a diversity consultant, said, “Clearly the administration doesn’t understand the purpose or value of diversity training, and that its intended outcomes are to create greater understanding and more inclusive, fair and equitable workplaces.”

Diversity training programs have been offered for decades by public and private employers alike. And some have increasingly focused on topics like “anti-racism” and “white privilege” following protests sparked by the police killing of George Floyd, a Black man, in May, diversity professionals say.

Many companies and government agencies have been scheduling listening sessions and other optional events for employees to share their feelings on these issues.

A Sept. 28 memo from Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, encouraged federal agencies to review diversity training with the terms “critical race theory,” “white privilege,” “intersectionality,” “systemic racism,” “positionality,” “racial humility,” and “unconscious bias.”

Contractors are concerned and confused, said Jim Paretti, a partner at employment law firm Littler Mendelson and a former chief of staff at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The government has never before tried to regulate the content of companies’ diversity training, he said, adding that his firm has received dozens of calls from clients with questions about the order.

At first, Littler believed the changes wouldn’t go into effect for 60 days. But last week, the agency overseeing federal contractors launched a hotline for workers to report their companies for potentially violating the order.

A spokesman for the Labor Department agency said it “is enforcing the order and is already reviewing complaints and inquiries sent in through the hotline. The agency will also be publishing FAQs soon.”

The same agency also sent letters to Microsoft Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co. last week asking whether the companies’ pledges to hire more Black managers and senior leaders constitutes unlawful discrimination. The companies said their diversity initiatives don’t violate U.S. employment laws.

Rosa Clemente, a public speaker and activist, said she was scheduled to speak at the National Credit Union Administration, a federal agency, last week. Less than 24 hours before the talk, she got word that her presentation would be canceled after the staff reviewed her PowerPoint presentation, which she said made references to “white supremacy” and “racial capitalism.”

“This wasn’t a training,” Ms. Clemente said. “It was a 45-minute conversation for Hispanic Heritage Month.”

The National Credit Union Administration confirmed Ms. Clemente’s account. A spokeswoman said the agency is reviewing the recently issued executive order and OMB memos.

Joelle Emerson, chief executive of Paradigm Strategy Inc., which provides diversity courses to companies, said her clients are also trying to figure out whether they are in compliance with the executive order. One government contractor decided not to move forward with training supplied by her firm because of the order, she said.

“Our training doesn’t actually violate the executive order,” said Ms. Emerson, but the order “is leading organizations to be confused and as a result pause all of their plans.”

The executive order quotes materials used at different agencies that it says are pushing “divisive concepts.” The examples draw from Mr. Rufo’s writings, including a recent seminar organized by the U.S. Treasury that he cited in a New York Post column. Mr. Rufo later wrote an opinion article for The Wall Street Journal, arguing that these training sessions aren’t about racial sensitivity but are about an ideological agenda.

Howard Ross, the diversity consultant who participated in the Treasury seminar, said his training and events focus on teaching empathy and creating a culture of belonging. “We don’t demonize any particular group, and in fact, it would be ludicrous for me to demonize white men. I’m a white man,” he said.

He said the Treasury seminar was optional and also featured Johnnetta Cole, the former president of Spelman College, as a speaker. He said a diversity office at the Treasury invited them after Mr. Floyd’s killing because white leaders were asking for ways to support their Black colleagues. A spokeswoman for the Treasury declined to comment.

Write to Khadeeja Safdar at [email protected] and Lauren Weber at [email protected]

White House Order Against Diversity Training Generates Confusion Wire Services/ WSJ.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here